Faculty Scholarship Repository
The Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law Faculty Scholarship Repository is a service of the Ross-Blakley Law Library that provides information, and where available access to, the scholarly work of the College of Law’s current full-time, emeritus, and retired faculty. Questions about the repository can be submitted to Ask a Law Librarian.
Publications for Laurence H. Winer
BOOKS
- God, Schools, and Government Funding: First Amendment Conundrums (Ashgate 2015) (co-author with Nina J. Crimm)
- Politics, Taxes, and the Pulpit: Provocative First Amendment Conflicts (Oxford University Press 2010) (co-author with Nina Crimm)
- Sacralité du Premier Amendement et Droit Fiscal aux États-Unis in La politisation du religieux en modernité (Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2015) (co-author with Nina J. Crimm)
- Dilemmas in Regulating Electoral Speech of Nonprofit Organizations in Not-for-Profit Law: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (Matthew Harding, Ann O’Connell & Miranda Stewart, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2014) (co-author with Nina J. Crimm)
- Don’t Bogart That Witness: The Caine Mutiny and Trial by Jury in Screening Justice: The Cinema of Law (Rennard Strickland et al. eds., W.S. Hein 2005)
- Gore Commission Issues Recommendations on Public Interest Obligations for Digital TV in The First Amendment and the Media (The Institute 1999)
- Jury Finds ABC Liable for Fraud and Trespass in Tort Action That May Affect Newsgathering in The First Amendment and the Media (The Institute 1998)
- Children Are Not a Constitutional Blank Check in Rationales & Rationalizations: Regulating the Electronic Media (Robert Corn-Revere ed., Media Institute 1997)
- Introduction in Cross Ownership at the Crossroads: The Case for Repealing the FCC’s Newspaper/broadcast Cross Ownership Ban (Media Institute 1997)
- Tax Laws Ban on Political Campaign Speech by Houses of Worship: Inappropriate Government Censorship and Intrusion on Religion , 2 Bar Ilan U. J. of L. Rel. & St. 101 (2013) (co-author with Nina J. Crimm)
- Gold and Silver, 50 Jurimetrics vii (2009)
- The Old Order Changeth, 45 Jurimetrics J. 333 (2005)
- The Soul of the Censor: the FCC Attacks Television Violence, Media Inst. Persp.: First Amendment Analyses Comm. Pol’y Issues (Nov. 2004, at 1)
- The Constitutional Case Against “Free†Airtime, Cato Inst. Pol’y Analysis (Aug. 6, 2003, at 1)
- Deficiencies of the "Aspen Matrix" , Issues in Broadcasting & Pub. Int. (March 3, 1998)
- Public Interest Obligations and First Principles, Issues in Broadcasting & Pub. Int. (March 3, 1998)
- Thinking Outside the Regulatory Box, Issues in Broadcasting & Pub. Int. (Aug. 4, 1998)
- The Red Lion of Cable, and Beyond? - Turner Broadcasting v. FCC, 15 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 1 (1997)
- The Unsettled Status of Lawyer Advertising and Soliciting After Went for it Decision, Com. Speech Dig. (Summer 1997)
- Court May Decide Whether First Amendment Gives Phone Companies Right to Sell Cable TV to Local Customers, West’s Legal News (January 1996)
- Must Cable Operators Carry Local Broadcast Stations?, West’s Legal News (September 1996)
- Medical Liberalism’s Past and Future, 34 Jurimetrics J. 235 (1994) (co-author with Mark A. Hall et al.)
- Lawyer Advertising in Arizona: The State Bar Run Amok, 23 Ariz. St. L. J. 741 (1991)
- Telephone Companies Have First Amendment Rights Too: The Constitutional Case for Entry into Cable, 8 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L. J. 257 (1990)
- Failure to Prepare: Who's Liable in a Computer Disaster?, 5 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L. J. 19 (1989) (co-author with Dan L. Burk)
- The New Media Technologies and the Old Public Interest Standard, 29 Jurimetrics J. 377 (1989)
- The Signal Cable Sends, Part I - Why Can't Cable Be More Like Broadcasting?, 46 Md. L. Rev. 212 (1987)
- The Signal Cable Sends, Part II - Interference From The Indecency Cases?, 55 Fordham L. Rev. 459 (1987)
- Public Comments of The Media Institute, the Matter of Public Interest Obligations of TV Broadcast Licensees, FCC Notice of Inquiry, MM Docket No. 99-360 (March 27, 2000).
- U.S. v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc, Brief of The Media Institute as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellee, United States v. Playboy Entm’t Group, Inc (2000).