|
Article
|
|
Kantian Autonomy and Divine Commands
|
|
Jeffrie Murphy
|
|
4 Faith & Phil. 276 (1987)
|
|
|
|
Open Access | Library Access
|
|
Abstract: James Rachels has argued that a morally autonomous person (in Kant’s sense) could not consistently accept the authority of divine commands. Against Rachels, this essay argues (a) that the Kantian concept of moral autonomy is to be analyzed in terms of an agent’s responsiveness to the best available moral reasons and (b) that it is simply question-begging against divine command theory to assume that such commands could not count as the best moral reasons available to an agent.
|
|
|