|
Abstract: How transparent are state governments in the United States? This Article explores the functioning of important, but often underappreciated, actors in the American constitutional system-state administrative agencies-and examines variation in the existence and implementation of transparency regimes across and within all 50 states. This Article first highlights differences that exist among state freedom of information (FOI) laws, focusing on three components: who can submit requests; the requirements for and exemptions to public release; and the process for appeal of agency decisions not to disclose information. Because FOI laws require the public to request access to information and permit state agencies to refuse release of records, these laws constitute "passive" transparency and have little effect without a strong administrative apparatus to facilitate implementation. Simply, FOI laws rely on administrators to interpret statutory language in ways that provide access to government information. Because passive transparency regimes like state FOI laws require high-quality administration in order to be effective, this Article presents a novel exploratory field experiment of administrative performance across all 50 states. Specifically, the Article evaluates state implementation of FOI laws using an original empirical study of 248 state agencies' fulfillment of the same FOI request. This study illustrates that agency-level factors such as administrative function, policy mission, and leadership influence information disclosure.
|